The knowledge that they hide from the public eye.

The Current Model For All Psychiatric Diagnoses is Borrowed From Astrology

The titled "Father of Western Psychology", Sigmund Freud, has been considered disproven. However, his disciple Carl Jung has not been considered disproven to this day, and today's psychiatrists still follow his model for diagnosis which Carl Jung admitted himself that he borrowed ideas from astrology to develop it
Carl Jung developed the DSM categorical model for psychiatric diagnosis based on Astrology:
It was the Swiss psychoanalyst, Carl Jung, who first recognized the vast potential of astrology as a tool for exploring the depths of the human psyche. In various writings throughout his life, Jung made reference to his profound respect for astrology. He asserted that astrology had a great deal to contribute to psychology and admitted to having employed it with some frequency in his analytic work with clients. In cases of difficult psychological diagnosis, Jung would draw up a horoscope in order to have a further point of view from an entirely different angle. "I must say," said Jung, "that I very often found that the astrological data elucidated certain points which I otherwise would have been unable to understand" (1948)
The current model for diagnosis attempts to fit people into categories of behavior, much like in astrology. It is considered that the current model for psychiatric diagnosis is scientifically meaningless, although it is still widely practiced to this day.
About Current Psychological Studies
When analyzing statistical data, you must always consider all the factors that go into how the study is conducted.
They measure people’s personality types in a one on one meeting at best.
Real wise knowledge of people: People can act differently around different people and in different environments, even people you think you know your whole life can be completely different people when you’re not around.
© 2021 Hazon, Nir

The First Dinosaur Fossils Were Found in the 1800's

The discovery of dinosaur fossils tells a ridiculous story.
They were found in 1822. On a walk! By a town in England.... and she was married to a geologist.
It just doesn't make sense how it took them until the 1800's to start discovering dinosaur fossils. The college textbooks on evolutionary biology don't mention when the dinosaur fossils were found and they don't make a big deal out of their discovery.
Scientists also claim to have found a giant underwater shark fossil 13 years after they started finding dinosaur fossils first.

Even the first Neanderthal fossils of the extinct closest human relative were discovered in the 1800's, in 1829 in Engis, Belgium.

The discovery of all the fossils started in the 1800's according to the Timeline of Paleontology.
Even the extinct relative of the alligator, the Deinosuchus, was discovered in North Carolina in the 1850s.

Would it be fair to question the authenticity of these fossils?
The fossils are then imagined in artistic drawings and graphic digital imaging.
(Early Human Neanderthal Species)


The current popular illustrations of dinosaurs in the mainstream media are inaccurate, as it has recently been discovered that dinosaurs had feathers.
Evolutionary biologists, who rely on the fossil record to be their strongest pile of evidence for the theory of evolution, fail to educate about polystrate fossils in college classrooms as polystrate fossils dispute our understanding of the theory of evolution as well as the validity of geology's method of dating the age of rocks known as the radiometric dating of rocks as the results cannot be scientifically understood in a repeatedly verifiable manner all across the board in nature. I have already shed light on the evidence that contradicts the theory of evolution in my article on the impossible intercontinental migrations of species. It goes to show that the establishment of a subject alone is enough for other people to believe in it’s validity.

Why is the above information about the fossil record being obscured in college education?
© 2021 Hazon, Nir

The First Observations of the Planets Were Made Using the Naked Eye

Even according to NASA, our first observations of Mars and other planets like Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, and Mercury including their mathematical patterns of movement were made with plain eyesight and were recorded on this Babylonian tablet right here.

Now google image NASA Mars photos from the Hubble Telescope.

This is the planet Mars. Do you believe in the planet Mars? All the photos are fully illuminated with the lighting. The photos appear from one angle. They look like sci fi projections made with digital art tools..... The color of the planet changes from picture to picture. The highest resolution image of Mars is low and we have high definition so-called photographs of far away galaxies. 
NASA Hubble Telescope so-called photograph of the Andromeda Galaxy.
Now look at this new portrait of Mars from the NASA Hubble Space Telescope.
The clouds that appear on the planet in this photograph are present on one side of the captured image on the left and the clouds are the most dense in the very center on the right side of the planet, but the majority of the planet in the captured image does not have clouds. Again, we are presented with another fully illuminated image of Mars. The lighting on these photos are a sketch. Again, the color of the planet is different than other NASA photos of Mars.
Check out this google image search of:
"clouds on Mars"
Again, the color of the planet changes from image to image.
You won't believe it!
NASA has been discredited.
"What?! How?!"
With basic chemistry.
NASA says the clouds on Mars are made of ice.
Hey you idiots.
Water becomes clouds in the gas state of matter!
Has anybody ever seen a liquid or a solid float in the air?
This is basic chemistry.

Clouds are a gas. Ice is a solid. NASA confirmed water flows on Mars in the year 2015. 

Google search has a bunch of sources including NASA and even all confirming that the clouds on Mars are made of ice 🧊 

Clouds. Made of ice. Made of ice crystals. Floating in the air. In the tightly packed arrangement of solid particles.

Who remembers when we couldn’t find water on any other planet other than Earth? In the year 2015, NASA confirmed that liquid water flows intermittently on present-day Mars. In the same article, NASA states that "Some of these planets that are the size of earth and in their habitable zone and could host life are a mere 12 light years away and can be seen with the naked eye in the night's sky." That's a quote from NASA.

Take another look at NASA images of the planet Saturn.
Does Saturn look like a real planet to you?
The Milky Way Galaxy
They go like "This is the Milky Way Galaxy"
I'm sure they sent a satellite all the way outside of our galaxy to capture this image.....  The images of all entities in outer space are all artistic depictions. Even Mars. Even the image that we have of the Andromeda Galaxy. All the planets in our solar system look like 100% graphic digital art. We are so stupid. The color of the planets in our solar system change from image to image. Google search any planet in our solar system and all the images are fully illuminated with the lighting and the color of the planets change.
Astronomy is Fake.

It is a recorded historical fact that the Babylonians from 2000BC also spotted Mars and were able to mathematically record its movement patterns. How did they see it and how did they know it was a planet and not another star in the sky? 
I couldn’t find anything about their advanced telescopes. Also google image NASA’s photographs of the planets in our solar system. They all look fake.
Why are all the planets in our solar system named after Greek Gods?

The scary part is Astronomy is something that we all believe in as a society due to blindly following our authority on knowledge when we should seek to see with our own eyes. Astronomy is an established practice and course of education. It goes to show that the establishment of a subject alone is enough for other people to believe in it’s validity.

NASA is fake.
Sorry to break your hearts, ruin your lives, or whatever...
© 2021 Hazon, Nir


The Replication Crisis in Psychiatry and Western Psychology


In the fields of psychiatric medicine and western psychology, scientists are currently figuring out that the results to many of the experiments performed in these fields cannot be replicated. In order for something to be considered scientific knowledge, you must be able to replicate the experiments in any setting in the world under the same conditions and get the same results. This is not the case for the experiments of western psychology and psychiatry. The most frightening part of this issue is that these experiments are used to prove statistical significance for gaining approval to use a medicinal drug in psychiatry. It has been found that doctors use data manipulation techniques such as stopping the intake of data as soon as a desired percentage has been reached as well as rounding the probability value to 0.5, which is the highest you can round the probability value to in order to prove statistical significance for use of a drug as a psychiatric medication.

They don't teach about the replication crisis in college in these fields and try to keep this information low-key. Many of the psychiatric and western psychological concepts and beliefs are disputable and the placebo effect is evidence of the innate healing abilities of the mind.

Statistical data is not what we consider to be scientific knowledge as according to the scientific method.

They don't even give you the variability factor of the statistical data used to prove a significant enough percentage for use of a drug in psychiatric medication because they don't even try to replicate the experiment.
Statistical data is vulnerable to fraud, miscounts, and data manipulation techniques.
You must give consideration to all the factors that go into how the study is conducted. 

The Replication Crisis affects psychiatric medications.

© 2021 Hazon, Nir


Pangea is a Hypothesis

The supercontinent of Pangea is a mere hypothesis. What caused Pangea to break up 180 million years ago? There is no valid answer available other than the currently observed movement of the tectonic plates was simply back-traced to a starting point.

"Scientists believe that Pangea broke apart for the same reason that the plates are moving today."

And in order for the rocks to make sense, there were other supercontinents before known as Gondwana and Rodinia. So according to this, all the land masses merge together over millions of years until they catch all the other landmasses in this ball of landmass, and then they somehow break up again. There is no answer as to what caused Pangea, Gondwana, or Rodinia to break up other than we know the tectonic plates move.

Also how did the Native Hawaiians get there? How did the monkey get to America? The theory of evolution is logically impossible.

© 2021 Hazon, Nir


The Correct Theory is Intelligent Design

The difference between most people and myself when I ask the questions "How did the Native Hawaiians get there?" or "How did the monkey get to South America?" is that most people will quickly dismiss the idea that the migration of these species from one corner of the world to another is logically impossible if they didn't take enough time to think about it and process it through. The migrations of these species or groups of people cannot be explained by logical means. The explanations for these migrations that are presented to us in the theory of evolution are ridiculous and I cover them in this article. 

Consider the following factual statements:

  • There is a monkey in South America.
  • There is a monkey in Africa and Asia.
  • The common ancestor of the monkey existed 21 million years ago.
  • 21 million years ago, the continents were separated by vast oceans which existed as massive geological barriers for land animals.
  • Migration is only possible by land, sea, or air.
  • The monkey couldn't have migrated to South America from Africa by land, sea, or by air.

If those species couldn't have migrated there, then life was intelligently designed.

Therefore, all beliefs that our existence is due to random chance are false.

Charles Darwin realized the same thing:

 For a complete debunking of the theory of evolution
Click the following link to view:
 The Theory of Evolution Cannot be True and This is Why

© 2021 Hazon, Nir

Learn how to think

What they didn't mention in your college textbooks.
- - - - - - - - -
This website will make any reader smarter.

Counter Indoctrination!

Indoctrination - The acceptance of knowledge without giving it serious consideration.

The Key Method for the Acceptance of Knowledge

"If any piece of knowledge is disputable, then it is because it's existence was not observed or it is not the only possibility.
-Nir Hazon the Most Serious Philosopher.

Click the following link to view:


Recent Posts