The Current Model For All Psychiatric Diagnoses is Borrowed From Astrology

The titled "Father of Western Psychology", Sigmund Freud, has been considered disproven. However, his disciple Carl Jung has not been considered disproven to this day, and today's psychiatrists still follow his model for diagnosis which Carl Jung admitted himself that he borrowed ideas from astrology to develop it. 

 

"Astrology represents the sum of all the psychological knowledge of antiquity" -Carl Jung

 

Carl Jung developed the DSM categorical model for psychiatric diagnosis based on Astrology:

It was the Swiss psychoanalyst, Carl Jung, who first recognized the vast potential of astrology as a tool for exploring the depths of the human psyche. In various writings throughout his life, Jung made reference to his profound respect for astrology. He asserted that astrology had a great deal to contribute to psychology and admitted to having employed it with some frequency in his analytic work with clients. In cases of difficult psychological diagnosis, Jung would draw up a horoscope in order to have a further point of view from an entirely different angle. "I must say," said Jung, "that I very often found that the astrological data elucidated certain points which I otherwise would have been unable to understand" (1948)

 

The current model for diagnosis attempts to fit people into categories of behavior, much like in astrology. It is considered that the current model for psychiatric diagnosis is scientifically meaningless, although it is still widely practiced to this day.

 

About Current Psychological Studies

When analyzing statistical data, you must always consider all the factors that go into how the study is conducted.

 

They measure people’s personality types in a one on one meeting at best.

 

Real wise knowledge of people: People can act differently around different people and in different environments, even people you think you know your whole life can be completely different people when you’re not around.

 

© 2021 Hazon, Nir

 

Share:

Read More

The Replication Crisis in Psychiatry and Western Psychology

 

In the fields of psychiatric medicine and western psychology, scientists are currently figuring out that the results to many of the experiments performed in these fields cannot be replicated. In order for something to be considered scientific knowledge, you must be able to replicate the experiments in any setting in the world under the same conditions and get the same results. This is not the case for the experiments of western psychology and psychiatry. The most frightening part of this issue is that these experiments are used to prove statistical significance for gaining approval to use a medicinal drug in psychiatry. It has been found that doctors use data manipulation techniques such as stopping the intake of data as soon as a desired percentage has been reached as well as rounding the probability value to 0.5, which is the highest you can round the probability value to in order to prove statistical significance for use of a drug as a psychiatric medication.

They don't teach about the replication crisis in college in these fields and try to keep this information low-key. Many of the psychiatric and western psychological concepts and beliefs are disputable and the placebo effect is evidence of the innate healing abilities of the mind.

Statistical data is not what we consider to be scientific knowledge as according to the scientific method.

They don't even give you the variability factor of the statistical data used to prove a significant enough percentage for use of a drug in psychiatric medication because they don't even try to replicate the experiment.

 

Statistical data is vulnerable to fraud, miscounts, and data manipulation techniques.

 

You must give consideration to all the factors that go into how the study is conducted. 

 

The Replication Crisis affects psychiatric medications.

© 2021 Hazon, Nir

Share:

Read More

Pangea is a Hypothesis

The supercontinent of Pangea is a mere hypothesis. What caused Pangea to break up 180 million years ago? There is no valid answer available other than the currently observed movement of the tectonic plates was simply back-traced to a starting point.

"Scientists believe that Pangea broke apart for the same reason that the plates are moving today."

And in order for the rocks to make sense, there were other supercontinents before known as Gondwana and Rodinia. So according to this, all the land masses merge together over millions of years until they catch all the other landmasses in this ball of landmass, and then they somehow break up again. There is no answer as to what caused Pangea, Gondwana, or Rodinia to break up other than we know the tectonic plates move.

Also how did the Native Hawaiians get there? How did the monkey get to America? The theory of evolution is logically impossible.

 

© 2021 Hazon, Nir

Share:

Read More

The Correct Theory is Intelligent Design

The difference between most people and myself when I ask the questions "How did the Native Hawaiians get there?" or "How did the monkey get to South America?" is that most people will quickly dismiss the idea that the migration of these species from one corner of the world to another is logically impossible if they didn't take enough time to think about it and process it through. The migrations of these species or groups of people cannot be explained by logical means. The explanations for these migrations that are presented to us in the theory of evolution are ridiculous and I cover them in this article. 

Consider the following factual statements:

• There is a monkey in South America.
• There is a monkey in Africa and Asia.
• The common ancestor of the monkey existed 21 million years ago.
• 21 million years ago, the continents were separated by vast oceans which existed as massive geological barriers for land animals.
• Migration is only possible by land, sea, or air.
  
• The monkey couldn't have migrated to South America from Africa by land, sea, or by air.
  

If those species couldn't have migrated there, then life was intelligently designed.

Therefore, all beliefs that our existence is due to random chance are false.

Charles Darwin realized the same thing:

 For a complete debunking of the theory of evolution

Click the following link to view:

 The Theory of Evolution Cannot be True and This is Why

© 2021 Hazon, Nir

Share:

Read More