<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Fear</title>
	<link>http://www.hiddenknowledge.net/2007/12/07/the-death-of-fear/</link>
	<description>Knowledge of what is possible is the beginning of understanding</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.hiddenknowledge.net/2007/12/07/the-death-of-fear/#comment-321</link>
		<author>Carol Webb</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hiddenknowledge.net/2007/12/07/the-death-of-fear/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Hello Kai,
You have understood the dilemma exactly.

In some ways I hope that the American people can keep their weapons, because we all know what is about to happen, but it is a great shame that they are needed at all.

To understand how they can be powerful without weapons, indeed that they are powerful, would be a huge undertaking in the wake of all the devices already in place to undermine their power. It would take a huge shift in consciousness, which I see happening, but too slowly.

It is my hope that people reading this site will understand that they need to, firstly understand the situation, and secondly set about freeing their minds or waking up from their hypnotic trance.

It can be done once intuition is acknowledged as the great teacher and guide that we all possess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Kai,<br />
You have understood the dilemma exactly.</p>
<p>In some ways I hope that the American people can keep their weapons, because we all know what is about to happen, but it is a great shame that they are needed at all.</p>
<p>To understand how they can be powerful without weapons, indeed that they are powerful, would be a huge undertaking in the wake of all the devices already in place to undermine their power. It would take a huge shift in consciousness, which I see happening, but too slowly.</p>
<p>It is my hope that people reading this site will understand that they need to, firstly understand the situation, and secondly set about freeing their minds or waking up from their hypnotic trance.</p>
<p>It can be done once intuition is acknowledged as the great teacher and guide that we all possess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAI JANSEN</title>
		<link>http://www.hiddenknowledge.net/2007/12/07/the-death-of-fear/#comment-320</link>
		<author>KAI JANSEN</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hiddenknowledge.net/2007/12/07/the-death-of-fear/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Dear Carol,
It seems to me that the founding fathers in the States got it right when they enshrined the owning of guns in the Constitution.
I have never owned one; as a Brit we were 'emaciated' a long time ago, but I see the need for an increased awareness of even this subject. To quote Benjamin Franklin: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote".
The reason 'they' wish to remove 150,000 handguns in America from private ownership is to be able to walk over any form of organised, future political resistance and I for one have not believed the contrived 'executions' of young, feeble-minded males, who have been manipulated into the position to create the fear. Of course all the 'do-gooders' are failing to recognise that it's NOT the guns that are the problem, but the cocktail of legally administered drugs and so-called 'therapy' that are the real culprit. It's like throwing out the cooker because you burnt the omelette. It's the wielder of the weapon NOT the weapon that is the problem. John Lennon was 'executed' similarly by being set upon by a drugged out and very disturbed assailant, whom I believe was rehearsed and placed. Afterall, you could not have the greatest PEACE MOVEMENT organiser since Ghandi, coming out of retirement and causing more problems for the so-called elite.
One has to be Pro-peace but I don't think it hurts to have that extra edge, just in case of 'unforeseen' problems.
On the other hand, violents begets violence, but it has to start with a thought of violence, so in owning a gun one does not neccessarily have violent thoughts and feelings, which is how the Universe transmits, is it not?
Kai Jansen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Carol,<br />
It seems to me that the founding fathers in the States got it right when they enshrined the owning of guns in the Constitution.<br />
I have never owned one; as a Brit we were &#8216;emaciated&#8217; a long time ago, but I see the need for an increased awareness of even this subject. To quote Benjamin Franklin: &#8220;Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote&#8221;.<br />
The reason &#8216;they&#8217; wish to remove 150,000 handguns in America from private ownership is to be able to walk over any form of organised, future political resistance and I for one have not believed the contrived &#8216;executions&#8217; of young, feeble-minded males, who have been manipulated into the position to create the fear. Of course all the &#8216;do-gooders&#8217; are failing to recognise that it&#8217;s NOT the guns that are the problem, but the cocktail of legally administered drugs and so-called &#8216;therapy&#8217; that are the real culprit. It&#8217;s like throwing out the cooker because you burnt the omelette. It&#8217;s the wielder of the weapon NOT the weapon that is the problem. John Lennon was &#8216;executed&#8217; similarly by being set upon by a drugged out and very disturbed assailant, whom I believe was rehearsed and placed. Afterall, you could not have the greatest PEACE MOVEMENT organiser since Ghandi, coming out of retirement and causing more problems for the so-called elite.<br />
One has to be Pro-peace but I don&#8217;t think it hurts to have that extra edge, just in case of &#8216;unforeseen&#8217; problems.<br />
On the other hand, violents begets violence, but it has to start with a thought of violence, so in owning a gun one does not neccessarily have violent thoughts and feelings, which is how the Universe transmits, is it not?<br />
Kai Jansen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
